In 2012, David Ludwig's group published a paper that caused quite a stir in the diet-nutrition world (1). They reported that under strict metabolic ward conditions, weight-reduced people have a higher calorie expenditure when eating a very low carbohydrate diet (10% CHO) than when eating a high-carbohydrate diet (60% CHO)*.
In other words, the group eating the low-carb diet burned more calories just sitting around, and the effect was substantial-- about 250 Calories per day. This is basically the equivalent of an hour of moderate-intensity exercise per day, as Dr. Ludwig noted in interviews (2). The observation is consistent with the claims of certain low-carbohydrate diet advocates that this dietary pattern confers a "metabolic advantage", allowing people to lose weight without cutting calorie intake-- although the study didn't actually show differences in body fatness.
In Dr. Ludwig's study, calorie intake was the same for all groups. However, the study had an important catch that many people missed: the low-carbohydrate group ate 50 percent more protein than the other two groups (30% of calories vs. 20% of calories). We know that protein can influence calorie expenditure, but can it account for such a large difference between groups?
Read more �
Related Posts:
Thoughts on the McDougall Advanced Study WeekendFor those of you who aren't familiar with him, Dr. John McDougall … Read More
Low-carbohydrate vs. Low-fat diets for Weight Loss: New EvidenceA new high-profile study compared the weight loss and cardiovascular e… Read More
Recent InterviewsFor those who don't follow my Twitter account (@whsource), here are li… Read More
What about the Other Weight Loss Diet Study??The same day the low-fat vs low-carb study by Bazzano and colleagues w… Read More